PLATFORM COMPARISON

maps vs In-house Cloud

Compare the maps multi-tenant platform approach with traditional in-house cloud infrastructure utilization.

Architecture Comparison

A side-by-side look at infrastructure efficiency and operational models.

maps Architecture

Centralized multi-tenant infrastructure with shared resources and unified operations.

Company A
App A
Company B
App B
Company C
App C
Isolated DB A
Isolated DB B
Isolated DB C
Multi-Tenant Platform (Shared)
Container Environment Shared Infrastructure
NGFW Security DDoS, WAF, IPS
Centralized CI/CD
Repository
Pipeline
Test Tools
Maps DevOps Team
Engineers
SOC
Operators
Efficiency & Coverage
Cost Coverage Platform covers ~75%
Development Speed Fast & Accelerated

In-house Cloud Infrastructure

Each company builds and manages its own cloud infrastructure with separate resources and teams.

Company A
App A
Company B
App B
Company C
App C
Isolated DB A
Isolated DB B
Isolated DB C
Separate Infrastructure
Container Env A
Container Env B
Container Env C
NGFW Security A
NGFW Security B
NGFW Security C
Separate CI/CD
Repository A
Repository B
Repository C
Pipeline A
Pipeline B
Pipeline C
Test Tools A
Test Tools B
Test Tools C
Individual Operations
Engineers A
Engineers B
Engineers C
SOC A
SOC B
SOC C
Operators A
Operators B
Operators C
Efficiency & Coverage
Development Speed Slow / Takes Time

maps is the Agility of Custom Build with the Speed of SaaS

Combine pre-built modules with tailored development on our shared cloud-native foundation to minimize costs and accelerate your launch.

Reduced Infrastructure Costs Reduced Operational Burden Simplified Implementation Faster Development Shared Resources Centralized DevOps
See Results

View Our Proven Track Record

Explore the successful implementations and results delivered by maps platform.

Contact Us View Customer